LightFighter Syndrome® Dissertation Entry Tues. Jan. 6, 2026, 4:44 p.m.

Upon speaking with the VA Office of General Counsel, the struggle with medical record protection faces the crucible of a non-veteran legal counsel Agency representing the Respondent in the Wisconsin Equal Rights Discrimination Court. First, the Respondent’s lead counsel uses legal licensure to subvert the long-standing protections of disabled veteran patients. Second, the legal Agency for the Respondent will not entertain nor agree that limited interoggatories is proper despite several ongoing email discussions regarding proper VA medical record repoting. Last, I have unitl Feb. 6, 2026, to retrieve said documents when we all know how the VA operates on the setting of snail when requesting records.

Today, I looked over three of the questions found in the Respondent’s Counsel’s interrogatories relentlessly demanding I provide:

• Intellectual property information used for the science communication research modeled under the LightFighter Syndrome® smart document work product fabrication for Microsoft currently under a Non-disclosure Agreement (NDA).
• All medical evidence Documents and prescriptions support your claimed disability and/or medical condition.
• All medical records, doctor’s notes, treatment notes, prescriptions, or evaluations relating to your claimed disability and/or medical condition.

For this reason, I must turn over my concerns to the William S. Middleton Veterans Memorial Hospital the request to file a Privacy Complaint. As patients, the VA puts us in the crosshairs of corporate citzen Goliaths like this one.

I am representing pro se and cannot find Contingency counsel. In many ways, this scenario seems biblical and all I have is prayer and meditation provided by the VA mindfulness programs. The road ahead shall outline in the Complaint how the State of Wisconsin does not sanction attorneys and restrict discovery to VA protocol. Instead, VA patients must face the wrath of Corporate Nebuchadnezzar who “wants ALL of the records” as previously stated.

My dissertation entry reports outline how the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division Administrative Law judge will make decisions outside the Court’s jurisdiction who is not the proper venue. Once discovery ends, the judge can sanction me to provide my VA records if the judge so chooses.

1. What is the venue?
2. Where is the attorney’s jurisdiction?
3. Why is the Wisconsin Administrative Law Court making Federal medical record decisions and why has the VA not acted in the best interests of patients to create a universal onboarding VA medical record smart document?

The State of Wisconsin Court System subjects VA patients to burdensome interrogatories. On Friday, I am meeting with an investigator after disrupting discovery and am uncertain how the Court can uphold the lawyer’s requests. I filed a grievance with the Wisconsin Supreme Court Office of Lawyer Regulation per the instructions provided to me by the VA Office of General Counsel. The subject matter in this case comprises using an AI Assistant for redacting non-accommodation disclosures and presentation to the public regarding secondary VA conditions irrelevant to the accommodation requested.

The end goal seeks stopping these corporate controlled employers from seeing your VA information automatically and creating precedent for future VA patients who seek working for employers who use AI for Human Resources VA medical record retrieval.

LEGAL NOTE: This document was developed from the Madison College Honors Research Project currently working with the VA Office of General Counsel seeking an attorney to guide the process of building a universal smart document for the protection of disabled veteran employees.