WISCONSIN EQUAL RIGHTS DIVISION OP-EXPOSE—Sun Prairie, Wis.: In legal studies, we are now allowed to blend 25 percent Open AI legally drafted work product.
Journalism eDiscovery uses 5 percent for brevity, and 95 percent objective evidence to develop metadata storytelling. In law, we have what is called, “the silent argument.” The silent argument in this case is three-sourced AI narrated data-driven journalism news footage stamped by a journalist who is studying law.
The Op-Expose converges a journalism Op-ed argument regarding lawyer sophistry with rhetoric and then exposes the flaws in their argument in the form of legal exhibit documentary.
Basically, as an editor, I decide what is and what is not newsworthy by the Respondent, generate a Journalism eDiscovery sophistry report, then argue the validity of the witness based upon newsworthiness that lawyers have zero clue how to do.
As of now, the ###BOBCOBB evidence blending manual is slated to publish in 2027 teaching you as a pro se litigant how to walk the fine line with ethical use of AI as a self-represented party and argue from facts, not legal opinion, that will help your case when you appeal. Then, you can turn the evidence into a documentary like I did with the video linked below.
In this exhibit, the Dept. of Veterans Affairs challenged that I am totally and permanently disabled after I worked for Frank Productions LLC for 13 months.
The rule makes clear that TDIU, which is the jargon we as disabled veterans use regarding the VA benefit, will sever if the employee works for more than 13 months. The VA then determines the employee gainfully employable.
I then took all of my footage and evidence gathered from the event and built Journalism eDiscovery as a documentary exhibit regarding how the company used voice-to-text retaliation with my conversation with Jadon Bower.
What Frank Productions found out last week was that the “off-the-clock” conversation video screenshots excusing Jadon Bower from union organizing as I was working to form and develop a security union to tackle micro aggressive management who neglected people with disabilities and ultimately terminated them.
I openly tell people that Frank Productions LLC terminated me for threatening violence after I tried to organize a union, which was the matter overlooked by the Initial Determination letter by the Wisconsin Equal Rights Division investigator.
As of March, I have appealed the Initial Determination and am now converging my Marcus Theatres appeal with this appeal and claiming the two cases equate to proof that ableism exists through constructive discharge in the form of medical document papering.
Substantive Facts: Frank Productions between 2023 to 2025 terminated over 200 employees and I am one.
We have an issue with egregious at-will termination privilege abuse and failure to engage in good faith dialogue. In Fall 2026, the matter will develop through the Legal Research and Video Production courses to develop the Op-Expose that contains all evidence into a Netflix submission press kit and then goes to Netflix for further publication review.
I am taking the Federal Labor Relations Act (FLRA) to the big screen on Vimeo and declare that all communications regarding my ERD matters comprise my right to discuss unfair labor practices on social media, YouTube and WordPress as concerted activity Op-Ed discussion.
Through documentary memoir called a “STEMoir” for STEM journalism science communication content blending, I am building ERD and EEOC exhibits through experimental law convergent media by blending Facebook metadata with ChatGPT driven KPI personas.
In the marketing field, we call this “crossing the streams” and could potentially cause a shift in how social media is used by attorneys and those who practice law without one.
This documentary and the remaining appeals will eventually end up on Vimeo exposing the Wisconsin Equal Right Division’s treatment of Pro Se litigants built upon recordings, letters from the Division and all matters legally publishable through the screening of Open AI.